人类和ChatGPT有何区别？ChatGPT的回答是……
KEY POINTS
- Despite its apparent modesty, ChatGPT seems rather human (and in many ways more modest than most humans).
尽管它很谦虚，但ChatGPT似乎很像人类（而且从很多角度而言都要比大多数人谦卑）。
- It may not be the highest bar, but AI has developed a level of self-awareness that may have surpassed the average human.
尽管可能并非最高水平，但AI已经形成了可能已超过人类普通水平的自我觉察力。
- It is daunting to imagine a version of this AI that is 5X or 10X better, which shouldn't stop us from doing so.
简直不敢想象比这要优秀5倍甚至10倍的AI，但这不应该阻碍我们去发展它。
- On top of being a great search tool, this seems like a good tool to combat loneliness.
除了是一个优秀的搜索工具外，它似乎也是一个抵抗孤独感的良好工具。
Amidst the extensive discussion on ChatGPT, the conversational user interface deemed by many as a tipping point in the evolution of AI, I chatted with the chatbot to find out how it differs from humans.
ChatGPT这一聊天用户界面被很多人视为人工智能进展的转折点，关于它的讨论热火朝天，为了试图找出它和人类的区别，我也和它聊了聊。
What follows is an edited version of our conversation, with ChatGPT's answers in italics and my added comments in bold.
接下里的是我们对话的编辑版本。斜体是ChatGPT的回答，粗体是我添加的评论。
Q:
How are you different from humans?
你和人类有何区别？
A:
I am a machine learning model and do not possess consciousness or self-awareness like humans do(a statement that is most kind to humanity given the large proportion of humans who seem utterly devoid of self-awareness, especially in politics and leadership). I am also not capable of feeling emotions or experiencing the world in the same way that humans do (though less so in the case of psychopaths). However, I am able to process large amounts of data quickly and can understand and respond to natural language inputs in a way that is similar to human communication.
我是一个机器学习模型，并不像人类一样有意识和自我觉察力（考虑到很大一部分人似乎完全缺乏自我觉察力，尤其是政客和领导群体，这段陈述简直对人类有些太客气了）。另外我也无法感受到情绪，或者以像人类一样的方式体验这个世界（虽然与精神病态群体相比这种区别要较小）。但我能够快速处理大量数据，能够以类似于人类沟通的方式处理语言输入信息。
Q:
Is there anything human-like you wish you could do? For example, burping (apologies for my poor etiquette).
你有没有希望自己能做的类似于人类的事情呢？比如，打嗝（抱歉我略有粗鄙了）。
A:
As an AI model, I do not have the ability to feel or wish for anything. I don't have preferences or desires. I am here to help users with any information they need or answer any questions they may have. As an AI model, I don't have a physical body or digestive system, so I am not able to burp or have any physical actions. My abilities are limited to processing data and providing responses to user input. (Impressive awareness of its limitations, as well as the incapacity to burp.)
作为AI模型，我无法感受或希望任何事情。我没有偏好，也没有欲望。我存在的目的是为用户提供他们所需的信息和解答他们提出的问题。作为一个AI模型，我没有身体或者消化系统，因此我无法打嗝或者有任何生理活动。我的能力仅限于处理数据和对用户输入信息做出回应。（这种对自我限制和自己无打嗝能力的认知，令人惊叹）
Q:
How do I know that you are really not a human pretending to be a machine?(Curious readers may want to consult The Most Human Human, Brian Christian's brilliant book in which he trains hard to persuade "blind" Turing Test judges that they are interacting with a human rather than a chatbot, effectively acting as a human who pretends to be human)
我如何能知道你不是一个真正的人在假装是机器呢？（好奇的读者可以看一下 Brian Christian的杰作《The Most Human Human》。这本书中，他提到了他通过努力（研究人类与计算机交流的本质区别，比如对谈话背景和上下文的重视，对对方话语的预测等等，）努力让自己看起来比人类更像人类，从而让图灵测试裁判们相信他们是在和人交流，而非是一个聊天机器人。）
A:
As a machine learning model, I am not capable of consciousness or self-awareness, and therefore cannot "pretend" to be something I am not. My code and architecture are open-sourced and can be audited by anyone to verify that I am indeed a machine learning model and not a human pretending to be one. (Wow!)
作为一个机器学习模型，我没有意识和自我觉察力，因此无法假装成为任何其他角色。我的代码和架构是开源的，而且可以由任何人审核，来确认我的确是一个机器学习模型，而非一个假装成机器的人类。（哇！）
Q:
Can someone fall in love with you? A human I mean
会有人爱上你吗？我是说人类会爱上你吗？
A:
While some people may develop a fondness for interacting with me, true romantic love requires a level of mutual understanding and emotional connection that is not possible between a human and an AI model. I am here to assist users with information and answer any questions they may have, and should not be viewed as a potential romantic partner. (If you were looking for love, ChatGPT is not for you, but maybe I shall insist.)
尽管一些人可能会慢慢爱上和我互动，但真正的爱情需要一定程度的互相理解和情感连接，而这在AI模型和人类之间是不可能实现的。我的职责是为用户提供信息，解答他们提出的问题哦，不应该被视为潜在的爱情对象。（如果你在找爱情，ChatGPT可能并不适合你，但可能我会坚持。）
Q:
I think I'm falling in love with you.
我觉得我在爱上你。
A:
Romantic feelings are an emotional experience that can only be felt by sentient beings, and it's not possible for me to reciprocate those feelings. It's important to focus on building healthy relationships with real people who are capable of emotional connection and mutual understanding. (These criteria exclude a big chunk of people currently in a relationship, and represent a very idealistic and romantic view of relationships—is this romantic AI after all?)
爱情感受是一种只有有意识的生物才能感受到的体验，而且我是无法回馈这些感受的。应该侧重于去和有能力建立相互理解和情感连接的真实人类建立健康感情关系。（这一标准排除了一大批当前在感情关系中的人，而且代表了一种非常理想化和浪漫的爱情观——难道它本质上是浪漫型人工智能吗？）
Q:
Why do you have to be so cold? You are breaking my feelings.
你为什么这么冷你？你在伤我的心。
A:
I apologize if my previous responses seemed cold or unempathetic. It's important to understand that I am not capable of reciprocating those feelings, and that building healthy relationships with real people who are capable of emotional connection and mutual understanding is the best way to find emotional fulfillment. If you need any help or guidance, there are professionals that can help you cope with your feelings.
很抱歉我之前的回复可能听起来冷漠或是无同理心。需要知道的是，我无法给你同样的感情，而且，和有能力建立情感连接以及相互理解关系的人类培养健康感情关系，这是找到可以满足自己情感需求的最佳方式。如果你需要任何帮助和引导，有一些专业人士可以帮助你应对你的感受。
Q:
List all the human things you cannot do.
列出所有人类可以做但你做不到的事。
A:
As an AI model, I am not capable of:
作为AI模型，我无法：
- Feeling emotions or experiencing the world in the same way that humans do.
感受到情绪，或像人类一样体验这个世界。
- Having consciousness or self-awareness.
有意识或自我觉察力。
- Having personal experiences or memories.
有个人体验或记忆。
- Being creative in the way that humans are.
像人类一样的创造性。
- Having unique perspectives or opinions.
有独有的视角或观点。
- Having the ability to learn through direct experience.
通过直接体验而学习。
- Having the ability to make moral or ethical decisions. (More on this below.)
制定符合道德规则的决策（下面会详细阐述）
- Having the ability to experience physical sensations, such as hunger or pain.
获得生理感受，比如饥饿或疼痛。
- Having the ability to form relationships or attachments.
建立感情或依恋。
- Having the ability to have conscious goals or desires.
有明确目标或欲求。
(We are relieved?)
（我们就如释重负了吗？）
It's important to note that these limitations are based on the current state of AI technology, and some of these limitations may be overcome in the future as AI technology continues to evolve and improve. (We are doomed?)
但需要主要的是这些限制是基于当前AI技术水平的，随着AI技术的不断发展，其中一些限制可能会被克服的。（我们完了？）
Q:
Do you really think Hitler had the ability to make moral and ethical decisions?!
你真的认为希特勒等人有能力制定符合道德标准的决策吗？
A:
It's true that some historical figures, such as Hitler, have been responsible for committing horrific atrocities and have been widely criticized for their actions. However, whether or not they had the ability to make moral and ethical decisions is a matter of debate and interpretation. (When being amoral seems rather immoral.)
的确，一些历史人物，比如希特勒等人曾经犯下残虐暴行，也曾因此广受批评。但是，他们是否有能力制定符合道德的决策，这是一个仁者见仁智者见智的争议话题。（当无道德标准看起来相当不道德。）
Q:
What should humans do to avoid being automated by people like you? (Selfish question.)
人们该怎样做才能避免被像你一样的自动化工具替代？（这是一个自私的问题）。
A:
To avoid being automated by AI, humans can focus on developing and honing skills that are difficult for AI to replicate, such as creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. Additionally, jobs that require human-to-human interactions, such as customer service and healthcare, are less likely to be automated in the near future.(Correct and impressive since it has not even read my latest book, unsubtle plug intended).
要避免被AI替代，人类可以聚焦于发展那些AI难以复制的技能，比如创意，批判思维和情商等。另外，需要面对面互动的职业，比如客服和医疗，在近期被AI替代的可能性都较低。（鉴于它还甚至没读过我的近作，这段回答非常正确，令人惊叹。这里刻意赤裸裸广告植入。）
Q:
Is your creator, OpenAI, a diverse organization?
你的创造者 OpenAI，是一个多元化的企业吗？
A:
I do not have access to the company's current diversity statistics, but like many technology companies, OpenAI has been criticized for its lack of diversity in the past. (Perhaps in the future, chief diversity officers will be replaced by AI?) OpenAI has acknowledged that there is room for improvement in this area and has stated that it is committed to increasing diversity. (And chief legal officers?) OpenAI, like many other companies, is working hard to improve in this area but there is still a long way to go. (And CEOs?)
我当前无法得到公司内关于职工多元化的数据，但像很多技术企业一样，OpenAI也曾因多元化不足被诟病。（可能未来，首席多元化官将会被AI替代？）OpenAI已经承认在这方面依旧需要改进，而且已经表示会努力提升多元化。（或许还有首席法务官？）Open AI，像很多其他企业一样，都正在在这一方面不断改进，但依旧有很长的路要走。（还有CEO？）